Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Àý»è°¡°ø°ú ÀûÃþ°¡°øÀ¸·Î Á¦ÀÛÇÑ Àӽüöº¹¹°ÀÇ µÎ²²¿¡ µû¸¥ ±¼°î°­µµ ºñ±³

Comparison of flexural strength according to thickness between provisional restorations fabricated by subtractive and additive manufacturing

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀÇ»çÇùȸÁö 2022³â 60±Ç 9È£ p.548 ~ 555
°­¹Î¼±, ÀÌÀçÀÎ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°­¹Î¼± ( Kang Min-Seon ) - Wonkwang University College of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
ÀÌÀçÀΠ( Lee Jae-In ) - Wonkwang University College of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics

Abstract


Purpose : The purpose of this study is to compare flexural strength according to the thickness of provisional restoration materials manufactured by subtractive and additive methods using CAD-CAM system.

Materials and methods : It was divided into three groups with different manufacturing methods, the CON group manufactured by the traditional method, the MIL group manufactured by subtractive methods and the DLP group manufactured by additive methods. Each group was divided into 3 groups by varying the thickness of the specimen (1.0 mm, 1.5 mm, 2.0 mm), and a total of 9 experimental groups were set. Fifteen specimens for each group were prepared in the form of a bar and the flexural strength was measured.

Results : According to the manufacturing method, the MIL group showed the highest flexural strength, followed by the DLP group and the CON group(p<0.01). In the MIL and DLP groups, the flexural strength increased statistically significantly as the thickness increased (p<0.01), but in the CON group, there was no statistically significant difference in the flexural strength at 1.5 mm thickness and 2.0 mm thickness(p>0.05).

Conclusion : Provisional restorative resins fabricated by subtractive methods showed higher flexural strength than those made by additive manufacturing, and both showed superior flexural strength than those fabricated by traditional methods.
Active use of the CAD-CAM system in the dental field is recommended, however, as the flexural strength decreases statistically as the thickness of the material decreases, we need to be careful about reduction in the thickness of the material.

Å°¿öµå

flexural strength; CAD-CAM; 3D printing

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI